On October 29, 2014 I decided, perhaps somewhat foolishly,
to smack a hornet’s nest. There’s, for whatever reason, a little boy inside
most men, and that little boy loves to tempt fate. He loves to say, “Hey, I
wonder how far I can go before the danger hits, and the pain arrives.” That was
me after my wife informed me about an apparently newsworthy article proclaimed
that Hollywood actor Shia LaBeouf had become a Christian was excitedly posted
on former evangelist, now pastor, Greg Locke’s Facebook
page. Let me first say, before I go any further, that I’d be included with
the most excited if Shia indeed did repent and accept Christ. My concern,
however, is that he is just one of an incredibly long line of imposters, who
have fooled many for a very long time. Other such notables from this long list
of supposed Christians include big names such as Constantine the Great, Napoleon,
Beyonce, Barack Obama, Eminem, and whatever celebrity who has just won a shiny
award. Again, I would love it if all on this list were truly born again, but
when they’re lined up against God’s standards in the Old Testament, as well as
Christ’s standards in the New Testament they’re found lacking. That should be
apparent, but the truly depressing thing is that those professing Christ as
well as following in His sound doctrine, cannot tell when someone is still lost
in sin.
So, I smacked the hornet’s nest with these thoughts in mind.
I knew what the outcome would be. Pain. What I’ve learned, through my own
foolishness, is that slowly smacking a hornet’s nest brings about greater pain.
The best way to smack a nest is to quickly, purposefully, with utmost intent do
the intended action. Be bold, one will still receive pain, but it won’t be as
great as if done slowly. This seems to hold as true with hornets as it does
with people. This is why at times a full frontal assault into enemy lines is the
best course of action. It will hurt, but in the end the job will have
successfully been done. Maybe the Holy Spirit had this in mind when He had Paul
write these words in II Timothy 2 –
1Thou
therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus.
2 And the things that thou hast heard of
me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be
able to teach others also.
3 Thou therefore endure hardness, as a
good soldier of Jesus Christ.
4 No man that warreth entangleth himself
with the affairs of this life; that he may please him who hath chosen him to be
a soldier.
5 And if a man also strive for masteries,
yet is he not crowned, except he strive lawfully.
6 The husbandman that laboureth must be
first partaker of the fruits.
Being nice in a battle can, and often does, get one killed.
It’s been my experience that when dealing with a religious crowd, both saved
and lost, that being “nice” when exposing issues of doctrinal error or sin
leads to much the same outcome figuratively. It does no good to dance around the
serious issues of life/death, heaven/hell, sin/repentance. Such a weak approach
allows the person in question to take charge of the conversation and steer it
away from the issues at hand. The lost always bring up non-issues once they’ve
been convicted of sin. The religious lost do so too, but add venom to their
statements. (If you don’t believe me, fine. But I’d challenge you, reader, to
go find a religious group that disagrees with you, and show them from the Bible
that they’re one heartbeat from Hell. Let me know how it goes. If you don’t
want to do that, repent of your fear of man, and go. If you still refuse, then
at least look at how the religious crowds in the Bible treated Christ and His
followers). It is a battle. A violent battle.
In warfare the side who has the best reconnaissance can plan
the most decisive and devastating attacks. Once a soldier knows who the enemy
is, and how to defeat him, the soldier can accomplish his mission with
aggressive celerity. On the other hand, if the soldier knows his mission, but
does not know who his enemy is or how to handle him, he’ll be doublemined and
cower. On the battlefield, doublemindedness will render a soldier inept at
best, and dead at least. With that in mind it is of the utmost importance to
know who is in your army. He must be identifiable. If he’s not, then either you
or the soldier next to you could suffer serious casualties. God knows this,
which is why He not only gave the marching orders, but also gave a clear
description of who the enemy is. Further, because He knew that communication is
of the greatest importance in a battle, He repeated His orders and His details
many times. Consider the orders found in just a few places – Matthew 28:19-20,
Mark 16:15, Luke 24:44-47, John 20:21-23, Acts 1:8. Then who consider we’re
fighting – Ephesians 6:12, 2 Corinthians 11:14-15, 1 Peter 5:8 – just to name a
few. Finally, what characteristics illustrate those on the enemy’s team –
Romans 1:18-32, Galatians 5:19-21, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, 1 John – again, just
to name a few passages. God never sent us into a battle unprepared. He does
expect us to know the difference between saved and lost (eg. Matthew 13,
Sheep/Goats, Wheat/Tares; John 3 Light/Darkness). We should not be ashamed of
knowing this truth. (Romans 1:16).
Yet Satan has a goal, he wants to keep the lost lost.
Knowing this plan, we, as ordered soldiers of Christ, must move boldly and
swiftly to defeat Satan’s plan by definitively convicting the lost of transgressing
God’s Law, and encouraging them to repent and put faith in Christ to save from
sin. Those are clear marching orders. The problem that so often occurs is that Satan
tries to play with the communications delivered from above. He and his
followers attempt to operate as double agents, and infiltrate in such a way
that they’re often undetected by the soldier who has not clearly understood or
heard the God-given orders and descriptions. Those who are found to be double
agents are swiftly, and boldly handled (Matthew 18, 1 Corinthians 5, 2
Thessalonians 3). Having such a person remain in your camp will destroy it from
the inside out. This is why such actions are to be taken seriously, and done
swiftly, as commanded in Scripture. (Do note that anyone can be fooled, and can
be fooled for some time, for instance Paul with Demas). Once that person has
been revealed; however, he must be boldly, and often emphatically handled, such
as how Paul handled Alexander the Coppersmith, or how John called out
Diotrephes. Was it pretty? Was it nice? Conversely this is why it appears that
Christians were so cautious in the New Testament. They understood that if one
were truly born again then the fruits of the Spirit would be genuine proof of
conversion. Further, did they hate sin the same way God does. Did they desire
fellowship with the brethren? Did they desire the things of God? Did they
remain entangled with the things of the world? Did they desire to spread the
warning of sin/judgment and the Gospel? If no to these things, then the
Christian knew that true conversion did not take place. Satan wants to
frustrate this, but in the end, he cannot replicate a truly converted person.
He can only blur the lines to knowing who is truly converted. He’s been
blurring those lines for quite some time now, and sadly, with success.
With this understanding in mind I stood against the
assertion that Shia LaBeouf is a genuine convert. I’d love to be wrong, believe
me. Alas, it appears that he fails the tests above. Let me explain it another way, those who are doing the things of God “shall
suffer persecution” John 15. Christ promised that. Granted Americans don’t
suffer Roman-style persecution, let alone Soviet, Nazi, or other Religious
persecution that many others do, and are suffering. But Americans do not
tolerate, even if they don’t feed Christians to the lions, Christ’s message of
sin-death-Hell unless one repents. If Shia were truly born again, we’ll see
this happen to him very soon. We’ll also see the 9 fruits of the Spirit
evidenced in his life very soon, as well as the other things listed above. I
honestly, and wholeheartedly, pray we do see this. If not, proclaiming that he’s
saved, and never dealing with the very real and serious issues of
sin-death-Hell and repentance, then we’re only creating a very staunchly
religious lost person. He still goes to Hell. Such action is equivalent of
treason in the spiritual sense. In warfare, treason is punishable by death. As
such, God pronounced a curse against those who preach another Gospel (Galatians
1:8). These matters are to be taken with utmost gravity. When someone deviates
from the marching orders, serious rebukes must be given in order to save the
life of the soldier, as well as those with whom the soldier may come into contact.
Ask a soldier who has been rebuked if his punishment was nice. If the
punishment was not well received, an even harsher punishment could be given. If
still not received, the soldier may be subject to court-martial or shot in a
time of war. In spiritual terms, that person is to no longer be fellowshipped
with. He may well have been a transformed angel of light wreaking havoc within
the body of Christ.
I sincerely hope that those offended at my rebuke do not
fall in the latter camp. My fear is that they are not enduring sound doctrine,
and are not receiving sound rebuke – as evidenced by their name-calling after
my sharp rebuke. That’s what the religious crowds did to Christ before Christ
lambasted them with a bombastic reply in Matthew 23. That’s what Paul endured
in Acts. All of those crowds thought that they were doing God’s service, but
they had no scriptural backing for support. My greatest fear, however, is that
this crowd has been duped by an infiltrator, and are in fact marching under a
different flag. If this be the case, please, examine yourselves whether ye be
in the faith. (2 Corinthians 13:5) There’s no time to lose.
As for Shia LaBeouf. He
had this to say about his apparent conversion. Maybe Greg Locke others did
not see it. Maybe they did, and are holding out hope. That’s fine. If you want
to hold out hope, great, but do so based upon Biblical lines. I said what I
did, the way I did it, because a lost life is a serious thing, and bad doctrine
keeps people lost. One may take offense at how I said it, fine. But no one on
that thread attempted to answer my comments with scripture. That being the
case, I infer that the issue with my comments was not one of scripture or
doctrine, but one of feeling or emotion. If that be true, then repentance of
pride is necessary, and a steady searching of the scriptures like the Bereans
in Acts 17 is absolutely needed in order to not be counted as the Laodiceans in
Revelation 3. I earnestly pray I’m wrong.
So, I hit the nest. The hornets are now buzzing about. Now I
know who are hornets, and who are not. I did not want to offend, but felt it
necessary in order to help maybe just one save some eternal pain.
*Nota Bene: Greg Locke has blocked my from his page and unfriended me since this encounter. I cannot see any new comments that have been posted to the thread.
*Nota Bene: Greg Locke has blocked my from his page and unfriended me since this encounter. I cannot see any new comments that have been posted to the thread.
Anyone that can read Shia’s comments and conclude that the actor is a born again Christian does not understand the issues of repentance and faith with respect to conversion. A professing Christian void of such discernment is likely a false convert, himself. The future worldwide church of the Antichrist will be populated with “Christians” who love the world and despise Biblical truth. I met a lost “Christian” today while doing 121 evangelism on a university campus. She has been part of an evangelical church for years, but could not explain why she was going to Heaven. When I explained the issues of sin, judgment, repentance, faith, new birth, etc., she responded as if she were hearing it for the first time. America contains a vast mission field of lost “Christians. If you want to truly help someone . . . to give them a CHANCE to be converted . . . it is essential to understand and to clearly communicate the Gospel in a Biblical manner.
ReplyDelete